 |
The overall plot defined
in Foxfire (1996) is permeated
by cliches. A tall, dark, stranger rides into town as the external social
catalyst. The stranger subsequently galvanizes four small-town girls into
action against local sexism and injustice. Along the way the girls, each
representative of a separate socio-economic class, are bound together as
they define their individual identity as women.
Films which seriously
explore social issues without slipping into standard cliches are rare.
A film which effectively uses these cliches to make a powerful point are
even more rare. Annette Haywood-Carter's
directorial debut of Foxfire proves that
she can skillfully use existing cliches to say something greater. Along
with screenwriter Elizabeth White,
she has effectively taken core elements out of the novel by Joyce Carol
Oates and woven the themes together with the language of film.
Using this rich nomenclature
and an audience's ingrained training in film history, the archetypical
stranger is masterfully introduced with a string of visual clues. Cinematographer
Tom Sigel shoots the
arrival of Legs (Angelina Jolie)
with the dramatic convention popularized by the Western. The first we
see of the antiheroine is her boots as she steps down from a car. This
is a timeless shot used repeatedly in Sergio Leone's films
to introduce The Man With No Name as he rides into town. The use of this
well defined technique obviates the need for any further explanation;
the audience has as much information as it needs to understand the character's
motivation. Legs enters the town in the role of avenging angel, a dark
cloud having obscured her past.
[ Next
]
J.
Trent Adams is visionary technologist working on a better digital tomorrow.
|
 |